For
more course tutorials visit
Medicare Debate. The Medicare system is currently
undergoing a dramatic shift, as the number of people participating is
increasing, which in turn has enormous consequences for how it is funded. Some
argue that Medicare spending is out of control and will result in a collapse of
the system if nothing changes, while others claim the system is doing well and
is meeting the needs of the millions of Americans who have no other health
care. For this discussion, you will participate in a debate with your
classmates about Medicare.
Students whose last names start with the
letters A-M will be on the “Maintain
Medicare As-Is” side. Students whose last names start with N-Z will be on the “Reform Medicare” side.
To start, you will need to craft your
initial argument in support of the side you have been assigned based on your
last name (either maintain or reform). This post must be a minimum of 300
words. Describe how the organization and delivery of Medicare and the social,
financial, legal, ethical, and regulatory forces impact your side of the
debate. Remember, your post must analyze how these factors work together to
support your assigned view on Medicare reform. Even if you do not personally
agree with the side that has been assigned to you, you must still present a
convincing argument that upholds that side in your initial post and your responses.
Then, you will respond to at least two of
your classmates’ posts who were assigned the opposite side of the debate. Each
of your responses should analyze how the differing stances on funding Medicare
affect the cost, quality, access, and provision of services. Your responses to
your classmates should present a counter-argument, where as a supporter of your
assigned side, you give reasons for why you disagree with them based on
pertinent information. You are strongly encouraged to review this week’s recommended
reading and to research on your own to identify other sources to support your
argument.
Your initial post must include:
1. A succinct thesis statement that
demonstrates your stance on the topic.
2. A clear explanation for your rationale
and examples to support your view.
3. A minimum of two scholarly,
peer-reviewed sources. One of these sources may be from the course Required
and/or Recommended Resources, and at least one must be obtained through the
University Library.
Each response to a classmate must be
unique and should include:
1. A succinct statement of your thesis
regarding why you disagree with their stance on the issue.
2. A clear response that explains your
rationale for your opposing stance and examples to support your view.
3. A minimum of two scholarly,
peer-reviewed sources. One of these sources may be from the course Required
and/or Recommended Resources, and at least one must be obtained through the
University Library.
No comments:
Post a Comment